ISLAMABAD: Former Prime Minister and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan is expected to announce the date for PTI’s long march toward Islamabad in the next seven days, PTI top leadership reportedly decided on Friday.
The senior leadership of the party met today where it was decided that the time for giving the final call for a protest in Islamabad has finally arrived.
According to media reports the long march could be announced around the third week of October, and Imran Khan has given the senior leadership instructions to begin making preparations.
In the meeting, “strong reservations were expressed regarding Ishaq Dar’s return and Maryam Nawaz’s acquittal in the Avenfield reference, and it was urged that the problem should be brought up with the masses,” they claimed.
Additionally, it was determined that the alternative of going back to the assembly would no longer be taken into consideration. Instead, the PTI would now head to the streets, where the people will decide the country’s political future.
Earlier, PTI chairman Imran Khan announced that he would soon give a call to his supporters to pull the country out of the crisis.
Addressing a ceremony at Lahore’s Edwards College in Peshawar on Friday, Imran Khan Former Prime Minister and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chairman Imran Khan questioned the security of the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) and asked the “Neutrals” who was responsible for the security breach.
“I ask them [neutrals] that the audio leaks of the Prime Minister Office […] if the security of the Prime Minister Office has been breached […] this means that our enemies have our sensitive information,” Imran said in a speech at Edwardes College in Peshawar today. “Who is responsible for it?”
“I ask the guards today […] Can the guards claim to be neutral if bandits are pillaging a house? What are the locals going to say? Imran asserted that Pakistan was also being “robbed” today while stating that the guards were neutral despite the fact that the home was being looted.
He continued by asking “who will protect the interests of the country” if the “neutrals” were simply in charge of prosecuting social media users, YouTubers, and television networks.
